 Zeiss User Forums |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reviews
|
Views
|
Date of last review
|
|
2
|
2792
|
Thu December 11, 2008
|
|
 |
|
Recommended By
|
Average Price
|
Average Rating
|
|
100% of reviewers
|
$650.00
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description:
|
Manufacturer description: This fast, standard focal length offers a natural perspective comparable to the human eye for a wide variety of applications. The Planar T* 2/50 ZM provides high imaging performance at full aperture, making it possible to use a shallow depth of field without compromising image quality. Combined with a digital rangefinder camera with a 1.3 crop factor, the lens has an effective focal length of 65 mm, ideal for portraits.
|
|
Keywords:
|
Planar T* 2/50 ZM 50mm f/2 f2 50 Zeiss |
|
|
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Posts: 257
Registered: November 2008
Location: Ellicott City, MD (US)
|
|
|
|
|
Author
|
|
Amin Sabet
Administrator
Registered: November 2008
Location: Ellicott City, MD (US)
Posts: 257
|
|
Review Date: Wed December 3, 2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $700.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp across frame, very nice bokeh rendering, neutral colors, low distortion, no focus shift, resistant to flare, solid build, small size, low weight
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
This is probably my favorite 50mm lens of the 10-12 50's I've owned to date. In addition to the positive aspects mentioned above, it shows great performance with near subjects (as well as far) and excellent sharpness wide open. It's a wonderful lens for both color and B&W.
|
|
|
|
andy_v
Member
Registered: December 2008
Location: Minsk, Belarus
Posts: 6
|
|
Review Date: Thu December 11, 2008
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $600.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Incredible sharpness, good contrast, great bokeh
|
|
Cons:
|
|
|
I love almost all the aspects of this lens. But I cannot recommend it for girls portraits elder then 20 years old  )
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by: ReviewPost PHP vB3 Enhanced
Copyright 2006 All Enthusiast, Inc.
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.
;)
;)
;)
